Protocol for a mixed-method analysis of implementation of case management in primary care for frequent users of healthcare services with chronic diseases and complex care needs.

INTRODUCTION: Case management (CM) in a primary care setting is a promising approach to integrating and improving healthcare services and outcomes for patients with chronic conditions and complex care needs who frequently use healthcare services. Despite evidence supporting CM and interest in implementing it in Canada, little is known about how to do this. This research aims to identify the barriers and facilitators to the implementation of a CM intervention in different primary care contexts (objective 1) and to explain the influence of the clinical context on the degree of implementation (objective 2) and on the outcomes of the intervention (objective 3). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A multiple-case embedded mixed-methods study will be conducted on CM implemented in ten primary care clinics across five Canadian provinces. Each clinic will represent a subunit of analysis, detailed through a case history. Cases will be compared and contrasted using multiple analytical approaches. Qualitative data (objectives 1 and 2) from individual semistructured interviews (n=130), focus group discussions (n=20) and participant observation of each clinic (36 hours) will be compared and integrated with quantitative (objective 3) clinical data on services use (n=300) and patient questionnaires (n=300). An evaluation of intervention fidelity will be integrated into the data analysis. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This project received approval from the CIUSSS de l'Estrie - CHUS Research Ethic Board (project number MP-31-2019-2830). Results will provide the opportunity to refine the CM intervention and to facilitate effective evaluation, replication and scale-up. This research provides knowledge on how to resp ond to the needs of individuals with chronic conditions and complex care needs in a cost-effective way that improves patient-reported outcomes and healthcare use, while ensuring care team well-being. Dissemination of results is planned and executed based on the needs of various stakeholders involved in the research.

The effectiveness of a proven chronic disease prevention and screening intervention in diverse and remote primary care settings: an implementation study on the BETTER 2 Program.

BACKGROUND: The Building on Existing Tools to Improve Chronic Disease Prevention and Screening in Primary Care (BETTER) randomised control trial (RCT) showed that the BETTER Program improved chronic disease prevention and screening (CDPS) by 32.5% in urban team-based primary care clinics. AIM: To evaluate outcomes from implementation of BETTER in diverse clinical settings. DESIGN & SETTING: An implementation study was undertaken to apply the CDPS intervention from the BETTER trial to diverse settings in BETTER 2. Patients aged 40-65 years were invited to enrol in the study from three clinics in Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada. METHOD: At baseline, eligibility for 27 CDPS actions (for example, cancer, diabetes and hypertension screening, lifestyle) was determined. Patients then met with a trained provider and prioritised goals to address their eligible CDPS actions. Providers received training in behaviour change theory and practice. Descriptive analysis of clinical outcomes and success factors were reported. RESULTS: A total of 154 patients (119 female and 35 male) had a baseline visit; 106 had complete outcome assessments, and the remainder had partial outcome assessments. At baseline, patients were eligible for a mean of 12.3 CDPS actions and achieved a mean of 6.0 (49%, 95% confidence intervals [CI] = 24% to 74%) at 6-month follow-up, including reduced hypertension (86% of eligible patients, 95% CI = 67% to 96%), weight control (51% of eligible patients, 95% CI = 42% to 60%), and smoking cessation (36% of eligible patients, 95% CI = 17% to 59%). Male, highly educated, and lower income individuals achieved a higher proportion of CDPS manoeuvers than their counterparts. CONCLUSION: Clinical outcomes from this implementation study were comparable with those of the prior BETTER RCT, providing support for the BETTER Program as an effective approach to CDPS in more diverse general practice settings.

Timeliness of diagnosis of HIV in Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada: A mixed-methods study.

Background: Late diagnosis of HIV is associated with poor outcomes and increased cost. Novel HIV testing promotion strategies may reduce late diagnosis. The purpose of this study was to determine the timeliness of HIV testing in Newfoundland and Labrador (NL), missed opportunities for testing, and barriers to HIV testing. Methods: Demographic and clinical information from individuals diagnosed with HIV in NL from 2006-2016 was retrospectively reviewed. Patients were also invited to participate in semi-structured interviews regarding knowledge about HIV transmission, risk associated with their behaviour, testing decision making, and testing opportunities. Results: Fifty-eight new HIV diagnoses occurred during the study period: 53/58 (91.4%) were male and 33/58 (56.9%) were men who have sex with men. The mean age at diagnosis was 40.6 (SD 11.05) years. CD4 count at diagnosis ranged from 2 to 1,408 cells/mm3, with a mean of 387 cells/mm3. For 39/58 (67.2%) of individuals, the first-ever HIV test was positive. Of the 58 patients, 55 (94.8%) had had health care contact within the 5 years prior to diagnosis (mean 13.7 contacts). Heterosexual men were more likely to present with a late diagnosis (p = 0.049). Ten (17.2%) individuals agreed to an interview. Thematic analysis revealed that barriers to testing were stigma, negative health care interactions, denial, and fear of the diagnosis. Conclusions: HIV diagnosis is made later in NL than in other Canadian provinces. Late diagnosis may be prevented if HIV testing became a routine testing procedure.

Historique: Un diagnostic tardif de VIH s'associe à un mauvais pronostic et à des coûts élevés. De nouvelles stratégies de promotion du test de dépistage du VIH limiteraient les diagnostics tardifs. La présente étude visait à déterminer la rapidité d'exécution du test de VIH à Terre-Neuve-et-Labrador (TNL), les occasions ratées d'effectuer le test et les obstacles à l'effectuer. Méthodologie: Les auteurs ont procédé à une analyse rétrospective de l'information démographique et clinique des personnes ayant reçu un diagnostic de VIH à TNL entre 2006 et 2016. Les patients ont également été invités à participer à des entrevues semi-structurées au sujet de leurs connaissances sur la transmission du VIH, du risque associé à leurs comportements, de la décision de subir le test et des possibilités de le subir. Résultats: Cinquante-huit nouveaux diagnostics de VIH ont été posés pendant la période de l'étude : 53 sur 58 (91,4 %) étaient des hommes et 33 sur 58 (56,9 %), des hommes ayant des relations sexuelles avec d'autres hommes. Les patients avaient un âge moyen de 40,6 ans (± 11,05) au diagnostic. Leur numération de lymphocytes T CD4 au diagnostic se situait entre 2 et 1 408 cellules/mm3, pour une moyenne de 387 cellules/mm3. Pour 39 des 58 patients (67,2 %), le tout premier test de dépistage du VIH avait été positif. Des 58 patients, 55 (94,8 %) avaient eu des contacts avec le milieu de la santé dans les cinq années précédant le diagnostic (moyenne de 13,7 contacts). Les hommes hétérosexuels étaient plus susceptibles d'obtenir un diagnostic tardif (p = 0,049). Dix patients (17,2 %) ont accepté une entrevue. Une analyse thématique a révélé que les préjugés, des interactions négatives avec le milieu de la santé, le déni et la crainte du diagnostic étaient les obstacles aux tests. Conclusions: Le diagnostic de VIH est plus tardif à TNL que dans les autres provinces canadiennes. Il serait possible de prévenir les diagnostics tardifs si le test du VIH devenait systématique.

Modified Reporting of Positive Urine Cultures to Reduce Inappropriate Treatment of Asymptomatic Bacteriuria Among Nonpregnant, Noncatheterized Inpatients: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

DESIGNWe conducted a randomized, parallel, unblinded, superiority trial of a laboratory reporting intervention designed to reduce antibiotic treatment of asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB).METHODSResults of positive urine cultures from 110 consecutive inpatients at 2 urban acute-care hospitals were randomized to standard report (control) or modified report (intervention). The standard report included bacterial count, bacterial identification, and antibiotic susceptibility information including drug dosage and cost. The modified report stated: "This POSITIVE urine culture may represent asymptomatic bacteriuria or urinary tract infection. If urinary tract infection is suspected clinically, please call the microbiology laboratory … for identification and susceptibility results." We used the following exclusion criteria: age <18 years, pregnancy, presence of an indwelling urinary catheter, samples from patients already on antibiotics, neutropenia, or admission to an intensive care unit. The primary efficacy outcome was the proportion of appropriate antibiotic therapy prescribed.RESULTSAccording to our intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis, the proportion of appropriate treatment (urinary tract infection treated plus ASB not treated) was higher in the modified arm than in the standard arm: 44 of 55 (80.0%) versus 29 of 55 (52.7%), respectively (absolute difference, -27.3%; RR, 0.42; P = .002; number needed to report for benefit, 3.7).CONCLUSIONSModified reporting resulted in a significant reduction in inappropriate antibiotic treatment without an increase in adverse events. Safety should be further assessed in a large effectiveness trial before implementationTRIAL REGISTRATION. clinicaltrials.gov#NCT02797613Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2018;814-819.

Operator Influence on Blinded Diagnostic Accuracy of Point-of-Care Antigen Testing for Group A Streptococcal Pharyngitis.

Background. Acute pharyngitis caused by Group A Streptococcus (GAS) is a common presentation to pediatric emergency departments (ED). Diagnosis with conventional throat culture requires 18-24 hours, which prevents point-of-care treatment decisions. Rapid antigen detection tests (RADT) are faster, but previous reports demonstrate significant operator influence on performance. Objective. To measure operator influence on the diagnostic accuracy of a RADT when performed by pediatric ED nurses and clinical microbiology laboratory technologists, using conventional culture as the reference standard. Methods. Children presenting to a pediatric ED with suspected acute pharyngitis were recruited. Three pharyngeal swabs were collected at once. One swab was used to perform the RADT in the ED, and two were sent to the clinical microbiology laboratory for RADT and conventional culture testing. Results. The RADT when performed by technologists compared to nurses had a 5.1% increased sensitivity (81.4% versus 76.3%) (p = 0.791) (95% CI for difference between technologists and nurses = -11% to +21%) but similar specificity (97.7% versus 96.6%). Conclusion. The performance of the RADT was similar between technologists and ED nurses, although adequate power was not achieved. RADT may be employed in the ED without clinically significant loss of sensitivity.

The Performance of Direct Disk Diffusion for Community Acquired Bacteremia due to Gram-Negative Bacilli and Its Impact on Physician Treatment Decisions.

Background. Direct disk diffusion susceptibility testing provides faster results than standard microtitre susceptibility. The direct result may impact patient outcome in sepsis if it is accurate and if physicians use the information to promptly and appropriately change antibiotic treatment. Objective. To compare the performance of direct disk diffusion with standard susceptibility and to consider physician decisions in response to these early results, for community acquired bacteremia with Gram-negative Bacilli. Methods. Retrospective observational study of all positive blood cultures with Gram-negative Bacilli, collected over one year. Physician antibiotic treatment decisions were assessed by an infectious diseases physician based on information available to the physician at the time of the decision. Results. 89 bottles growing Gram-negative Bacilli were included in the analysis. Direct disk diffusion agreement with standard susceptibility varied widely. In 47 cases (52.8%), the physician should have changed to a narrower spectrum but did not, in 18 cases (20.2%), the physician correctly narrowed from appropriate broad coverage, and in 8 cases (9.0%), the empiric therapy was correct. Discussion. Because inoculum is not standardized, direct susceptibility results do not agree with standard susceptibility results for all drugs. Physicians do not act on direct susceptibility results. Conclusion. Direct susceptibility should be discontinued in clinical microbiology laboratories.

A cross sectional study of animal and human colonization with Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in an Aboriginal community.

BACKGROUND: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections are common among humans in Aboriginal communities in Canada, for unknown reasons. METHODS: Cross sectional study of humans and dogs in an Aboriginal community of approximately 1200 persons. Our objectives were to measure community-based prevalence of nasal MRSA colonization among humans, use multivariable logistic regression to analyze risk factors for MRSA colonization, and perform molecular typing of Staphylococci isolated to investigate interspecies transmission. RESULTS: 461 humans were approached for consent and 442 provided complete data. 109/442 (24.7 %, 95 % C.I. = 20.7-28.7 %) of humans were colonized with MRSA. 169/442 (38.2 %) of humans had received antibiotics in the last 12 months. Only number of rooms in the house (OR 0.86, p = 0.023) and recreational dog use (OR 7.7, p = 0.002) were significant risk factors for MRSA colonization. 95/109 (87.1 %) of MRSA strains from humans were of the same spa type (CMRSA10/USA300). 8/157 (5.1 %, 95 % C.I. = 1.7-8.5 %) of dogs were colonized with methicillin-susceptible S. aureus, and no dogs were colonized with MRSA. CONCLUSIONS: Human MRSA colonization in this community is very common, and a single clone is predominant, suggesting local transmission. Antibiotic use is also very common. Crowding may partially explain high colonization, but most considered risk factors including animal exposure were not predictive. Very few dogs carried human Staphylococcal strains.

Urinary tract infection diagnosis and response to therapy in long-term care: A prospective observational study.

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of asymptomatic bacteriuria among residents of long-term care (LTC) facilities is high, and is a source of inappropriate antibiotic prescription. OBJECTIVE: To establish symptoms and signs associated with a positive urine culture, and to determine whether antibiotic therapy is associated with functional improvement. METHODS: A total of 101 LTC patients were prospectively observed after submission of urine for culture. RESULTS: The culture positivity rate was consistent with the expected asymptomatic bacteriuria rate. Change in mental status and male sex were associated with culture positivity. Treatment decisions were not consistent with culture results. Treatment did not lead to improvement in activities of daily living scores at two days or seven days. DISCUSSION: Significant growth cannot be well predicted based on clinical variables; thus, the decision to submit urine is somewhat arbitrary. Because urine culture testing and treatment does not lead to functional improvement, restricting access to the test may be reasonable. CONCLUSION: Urine culture testing in LTC facilities does not lead to functional improvement.

HISTORIQUE: La prévalence de bactériuries asymptomatiques est élevée chez les résidents d'établissements de soins de longue durée (SLD). Elle suscite la prescription inappropriée d'antibiotiques. OBJECTIF: Déterminer les signes et symptômes associés à une culture d'urine positive et établir si l'antibiothérapie favorise une amélioration fonctionnelle. MÉTHODOLOGIE: Au total, 101 patients en SLD ont fait l'objet d'une observation prospective après l'envoi d'un prélèvement d'urine pour culture. RÉSULTATS: Le taux de cultures positives était conforme au taux prévu de bactériuries asymptomatiques. La détérioration de l'état mental et le sexe masculin s'associaient à des cultures positives. Les décisions thérapeutiques n'étaient pas en accord avec les résultats des cultures. Le traitement ne suscitait pas d'amélioration à l'indice d'activités de la vie quotidienne au bout de deux ou sept jours. EXPOSÉ: Les variables cliniques ne permettent pas de prévoir une croissance importante. Ainsi, la décision de faire une culture d'urine est quelque peu arbitraire. Puisque les cultures d'urine et le traitement n'assurent pas d'amélioration fonctionnelle, il est peut-être raisonnable de restreindre l'accès aux analyses. CONCLUSION: Dans les établissements de SLD, les analyses d'urine ne favorisent pas d'amélioration fonctionnelle.

Peripheral injections of cholecystokinin, apelin, ghrelin and orexin in cavefish (Astyanax fasciatus mexicanus): effects on feeding and on the brain expression levels of tyrosine hydroxylase, mechanistic target of rapamycin and appetite-related hormones.

The effects of intraperitoneal injections of cholecystokinin (CCK), apelin, ghrelin, and orexin on food intake were examined in the blind cavefish Astyanax fasciatus mexicanus. CCK (50ng/g) induced a decrease in food intake whereas apelin (100ng/g), orexin (100ng/g), and ghrelin (100ng/g) induced an increase in food intake as compared to saline-injected control fish. In order to better understand the central mechanism by which these hormones act, we examined the effects of injections on the brain mRNA expression of two metabolic enzymes, tyrosine hydroxylase (TH), and mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR), and of appetite-regulating peptides, CCK, orexin, apelin and cocaine and amphetamine regulated transcript (CART). CCK injections induced a decrease in brain apelin injections, apelin injections induced an increase in TH, mTOR, and orexin brain expressions, orexin treatment increased brain TH expression and ghrelin injections induced an increase in mTOR and orexin brain expressions. CART expression was not affected by any of the injection treatments. Our results suggest that the enzymes TH and mTOR and the hormones CCK, apelin, orexin, and ghrelin all regulate food intake in cavefish through a complex network of interactions.